> Rather than port James to a new set of "Foo" interfaces,
> why not implement Avalon's "Serviceable/Configurable/etc"
> interfaces to your own "Foo" environment, enabling you to
> port all apps. conforming to the Avalon interfaces?
Because the goal would be container independence, not another container
hosting Avalon-specific apps. :-) And James could certainly benefit from
such.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
