No it wouldn't. Imagine I would like to send mail from localhost without
authentication? I just can't. At this point I have to chose between
authentication working through a local proxy or allowing localhost to
send mail.
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
But wouldn't it be totally equivalent to commenting out such option?
Vincenzo
Jacques Lema wrote:
Yes, of course I actually fixed the problem for me by commenting this
line since this exact server doesn't really need to allow localhost to
send mail. However I think it would be a nice addition to have an
option to force always showing the AUTH capability. I am not familiar
with james source but I am pretty sure this is a quick one.
No, in 2.2.0 if the remote IP is in the authorized network specified
with <authorizedAddresses>, the SMTP AUTH will not be enforced.
BTW, perhaps Jacques can solve his problem just commenting out his
<authorizedAddresses>127.0.0.1</authorizedAddresses> entry, unless
there is any other need.
Vincenzo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
