JCluster looks very promising. It seams fairly straight forward. I will try replacing the JGroups code in our distributed lock with JCluster code over the weekend.
-Mike On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 20:06, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Let me see if I understand correctly. Our distributed locking code > > could be compiled into James but in order for people to use it, they > > would have to download JGroups on their own? Would the build system > > have to download JGroups to build? I'm assuming including JGroups in > > CVS would also be a form of distributing JGroups. > > As I understand it, the author of JGroups understands that LGPL is a > problematic license, but doesn't want to change it. Instead, he and others > developed a new package called JCluster (https://jcluster.dev.java.net) that > does for clustering what java.sql does for JDBC. Basically, you write your > code to JCluster, and it uses whatever clustering package is configured, in > this case JGroups. > > James Strachan would have better information, so I am cc'ing him. > > Alternatively, when we can see your repository subclass, perhaps we can > figure out another solution, if the only thing that JGroups is being used > for is distributed locking. > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
