> 1) The document source format which is difficult to develop and
> maintain without a WSIWYG editor that natively supports the
> chosen format.
Really? I do it all by hand in emacs.
> 2) The task(s) used to transform each document from source format to
> presentation format.
We have that in our build process: ./build.sh website. I didn't realize it
ws a problem.
> 3) The organisation of the content.
That I do agree needs to be adjusted.
> 4) The build tool used to drive the task(s) in (2).
I'd suggest that we move to a modern version of Ant.
> I took a quick look at Apache Forrest
Forrest is nice, but has had some stability issues. However, if Nicola
and/or David are willing to help out, I'd be find with Forrest.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
