I've been messing with Derby recently and wondered if we shouldn't just bundle derby for people who don't care what happens..?
Otherwise I think we will need to deprecate the cornerstone ones in favour of something better for our sanity if nothing else. These have had "issues" for as long as I've been involved and I'd cheer, loudly, if we saw the back of them. I believe that the NNTP server uses a much simpler format for its file repo's, mabey you could re-use something from that? d. On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:55:15 -0000, Jason Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry to all those waiting for the IMAP work to be committed, but what with > changing jobs and looking after 2 small people my time has become a little > tight... > > However, this has not stopped me thinking about the biggest issue the IMAP > server faces and that is the repository interface. At the moment I feel I'm > trying to ram a very square peg into a very round hole and it's fairly > painful. > > The database repositories are simple to deal with as we (James) own the > code. My main issue is with the Cornerstone file: repositories as they are > "owned" by the Avalon project. I would like to make changes to these, but I > need to know if we are still going to be going forward with > Cornerstone/Avalon or whatever. > > -- Jason > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
