> -----Original Message----- > From: Soren Hilmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... > If CornerStone is alive and well, submitting the code back would be a good > move. But If my memory does not fail me completely (I often get the issues > on Phoenix and CornerStone and Avalon mixedup in my head) the current > James 2.1 branch is stuck with an old CornerStone build (actually one that > is not even tagged in the CornerStone-CVS, so we cannot recreate it) in > which case we also need to put the code into James.
Cornerstone isn't necessarily "alive and well" but it is accessible. We moved it to Excalibur so that there would at least be somebody watching over it. However, if James would rather take it over, I don't think anyone in Excalibur will complain too much. If your interested in doing much with Cornerstone, I would seriously suggest someone post a note to Paul since he was the last working on it and had some plans on resurrecting it. jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
