On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:06:53 -0800, Steve Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW I was playing with Spring and James a while ago as a learning > exercise and got all of James running in Spring with no code changes to > James or Avalon components.
Thats good news. It is what the theory lets us expect, but its nice to have it proven. That might be a good migration path. Phoenix -> Spring -> simplify James classes -> tear down avalon dependance --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
