> http://activemq.codehaus.org/ > > a) we adopt JMS and get the standard messaging framework > abilities to... > 1) dump our thread pools and scheduling logic
I think that there would be thread pools management at least for RemoteDelivery, don't we? > Anyway, this is an incredibly non-trivial change, but as long > as people are considering POJO and Spring, this would fit > nicely into that architecture, and it is Apache-style licensing. Are you thinking to ActiveMQ as an alternative to spoolrepositories/spoolmanager/processors or the JamesSpoolManager/LinearProcessor should be translated in a ActiveMQ specific broker? Do you know if ActiveMQ queues provides services needed by the RemoteDelivery's "outgoing" spool like accepting messages with no errors or with a given formula between the last attempt time and the retry count? Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
