Quoting Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > +1, let's get started doing some POJO > > +1
yup. > Can we stop the debate and just vote on a DI design pattern we should > follow? I for one am a strong proponent of providing both methods for > DI. Each POJO should have a default constructor and a dependency > injecting constructor that calls the setter dependency injectors. This > would provide maximum compatibility and flexibility with the various > containers. > I am happy with that. (wont work directly with cdi, but all you require is subclass with same main constructor with a super call) Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
