> I saw the point was more that we would not lose anything (since > everything is in SVN) if we dumped what we have in MAIN (now trunk) and > replaced it with branch_2_1_fcs. And, since we're agreeing on an > evolutionary move away from our current dependencies, we could replace > trunk with what's in branch_2_1_fcs to: > - have code releases come off of trunk (simpler), and > - only one branch to maintain (more efficient)
+1 the evolutionary approach seems to have support from people who are prepared to put in the hours. So why not just swap branch_2_1_fcs with HEAD and evolve "2" > As tempting as it is, you have done way too much to deserve blame. +1 Yeah way too much, the issue is should we expect you to do more or take a pragmatic view of the current state of the project and the ambitions of the community? I say we be realistic and don't expect Noel to be a silver bullet. > Now that we are building consensus and direction, I'd like to simplify > our path to move us forward. While it is painful to just kill a branch, > unless you suddenly become unemployed (or we massively and unfairly > guilt-trip you into skipping work for a week), I see it as the simplest > course of action. +1. Theres no shame in taking a fresh look at things and starting from where we actually are, not where we had hoped to be. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
