> Were we thinking of requiring JDK 1.4 for James 3.0? If so, we could
> move to using java.util.regex, eh?
I would like to get this version stable, and we can branch it as a JDK 1.3
branch, so that we'll have something good for people still stuck on JDK 1.3.
Then we can look at moving mainstream development (trunk) to require JDK 1.4.
As for oro vs j.u.regex, we'd have to compare to see. I'm comfortable with
Oro. It works, we have good code for it, we understand any threading issues.
But if someone else wants to make the effort ...
If this merged code works, what do we want to do about a release? We've got
some pending changes we can start making again. <<whew>> And I'd like to see
some of the new contributors submitting patches and working towards
Committership.
High up on my personal priority list is getting the in-process processor into
the system.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
