> On 04/05/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Danny wrote: > > > But have we tested and verified that capability, specifically? > > No but we can reason that James is compliant based upon the > design of the SMTP handler and the fact that the SMTP handler > works as designed.
I've done a test today against the trunk: It seems that James will not handle buffered commands after the DATA. So I think that currently we are not PIPELINING compliant. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
