Thanks Joe! If you've you look recently I've decided to ask that the SEARCH command be implemented rather than a nasty protocol/repository tidy up, so your timing is perfect. -- Jason
> -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Cheng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 June 2005 19:30 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: Summer of code - IMAP > > Jason Webb wrote: > > >BTW IMAP4v1 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2060.txt is a complex protocol. > >Implementing IMAP on James may sound glamorous but it is *very* > complicated. > >I'm not trying to put people off, just to make sure you make an informed > >choice. > > > > > +1. Not a nice protocol to work with. SMTP and POP are at least an > order of magnitude more straightforward. > > >You may note from the proposals directory that Darrell has provided a > >complete IMAP stack that works, so there is no protocol work to do. > > > > > Is the SEARCH command implemented? Last time I checked, it was just > stubbed out with a TODO. It's a non-trivial command to parse. I've got > some code we could use, or an intern could do it as an interesting > parsing exercise. > > Also it would be nice to have IDLE as well. The protocol part of that > should be trivial, though. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
