On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:05 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > per you suggestion (http://tinyurl.com/c95ph), James-HA depends on > > JCluster (https://jcluster.dev.java.net/) which is BSD licensed. > > Ah ... your code has comment references to JGroups, such as: > > groupName - The JGroups group name used for the distributed locking. > protocolStack - The JGroups protocol stack used for the distributed > locking. > > which is what I was reading. If there are no code points that touch > JGroups, that does help.
To clarify, I fixed all the comments that made reference to JGroups. Since we're pointing out the flaws in the James-HA distributed lock, I should not that it is not perfect. The most glaring flaw is that it does not have a method for shutting down and removing itself from the group communication channel. This should be an easy fix though. I should also point out that the code in CVS HEAD is the only code that works well. I would also like to make the distributed lock easier to configure. In spite of these problems, the distributed lock does function and has passed all of my tests. I would still like to do more robust testing to ensure the lock will still work well in a large cluster under heavy load. I am willing to work out any issues with the distributed lock if James wants to include it. <snip> -Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
