Ahmed Mohombe wrote: > Sent: 18 August 2005 09:03 > To: server-dev@james.apache.org > Subject: Re: Status Update - James Fast Fail > > > > Noel, > > The reason I though of it was to let people get binaries > with the SoC stuff > > in it. > > That might get us a bigger pool of testers than making > people use svn > > would. > + 1. > And it will avoid the situation where what users check out, does not > compile. (I suppose the nightly builds should compile at least :) ).
Gump builds against the latest development versions of our dependencies, giving us early warning of possible problems ahead. It does not produce a legitimate package for distribution. We do not automatically incorporate the latest development versions of our dependencies, the ones that Gump uses, into our codebase. Gump is telling us what we need to fix if we do. Regular, perhaps nightly, builds may be a good thing, but they are not Gump related and would use chosen versions of the dependencies, not the latest ones that Gump uses. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
