> > This could be the last step. I haven't seen effort in that > direction by now. > There was even a 'demo site' with fisheye on it started by > Alexander Zhukov: > news://news.gmane.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > the thread with [James-NG] in the subject.
Last time I checked James-NG I only saw the POP3 server POJO. James is much more than a POP3 server. I don't think James-NG has been improved in the last months (no news here). > > The only component I don't like from the avalon stuff is > the Configuration: > > it is very powerful but I would prefer to have bean based > configuration (We > > already have a similar configuration in > smtp/pop3/nntp/fetchmail services). > My biggest problem with it is that it can't really 'reload' > it's content > while JAMES is running. JAMES developers said that this is > an Avalon > limitation. Avalon DOES support reloading of components and reloading of configurations! It's phoenix that does not suport it and it's our components currently not using the reloadable interfaces! Switching them to POJO will not bring us reloadability. Avalon does provide Reconfigurable interface, Recontenxtualizable, Suspendable interfaces that have been created for this purpose. Please look better at the avalon framework before shooting it. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
