> Again to me, if we get rid of the whitespace issue so we can > basically use the same configuration file, this seems like a > change worth discussing.
I think we should first discussing then try to make it work. I don't want to loose time "hacking" loom and then stop against a -1. I will work on the dbcp issue and whitespace issue ONLY if there is consensus that the change is a good thing (I will do other tests only if I see at least 3 +1 to test it and no -1) I've already done the "proof of concept" by running my james with NO CODE CHANGES (the ones I already committed apart). Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
