On 21/09/05, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it's not up to me to decide who is a troll or not but having a quick > way to get JAMES running in an IDE doesn't seem to a bad idea ....
No it doesn't, in fact it seems like a good idea to me. Having IDE configuration files checked in to svn doesn't seem like such a great idea though, and I thought that the general rule for ASF projects is not to do this. First of all we'd have to maintain them, and if we know that we aren't going to maintain them they should be somewhere else, a wiki perhaps or the mailinglist archive. I personally think that checking tool configs into svn is the least palatable of a number of possible alternatives, and would much rather have either scripts which can create the configurations (like maven-eclipse) or a much more straightforward project layout which would allow IDE's to more easily "auto-discover" James, or simply better documentation. As a final thought on the subject I'd say that as no-one has ever submitted such a file and James is going strong the point is pretty academic. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
