You guys are right.. its ugly code but it works.. so its better then nothing ;-)
bye Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 22:18 +0100 schrieb Pierre Smits: > On 3/2/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Pierre Smits wrote: > > > Norman, > > > > > > It does not work with the latest trunk. I have tested that. It has been > > > developed with version 2.2.0 in mind a while back by Daniel Perry before > > > there was even a hint of 2.3.x > > > > I never used that patch, but I just looked the sources and I think it > > should work with James trunk too. > > Maybe the line numbers are not good, but the added code should work. > > > > Try a manual merge and let me know if you have problem with missing > > methods/components. > > > > Stefano > > > > PS: It's unlikely that the patch will be included in james 2.3.0. Maybe > > we'll include a modular way to find out the servernames but not exactly > > this (this patch add an "ugly" dependency between James main component > > and a db table with a structure specific to the virtuser mailet) > > > I agree with Stefano. Setup of virtual users and virtual domains should be > modular and as generic as possible. > As such it should be as easy working with any db, directory or xml > definition. > > Pierre > !EXCUBATOR:2,44076148268921111918378! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
