You guys are right.. its ugly code but it works.. so its better then
nothing ;-)

bye

Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 22:18 +0100 schrieb Pierre Smits:
> On 3/2/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Pierre Smits wrote:
> > > Norman,
> > >
> > > It does not work with the latest trunk. I have tested that. It has been
> > > developed with version 2.2.0 in mind a while back by Daniel Perry before
> > > there was even a hint of 2.3.x
> >
> > I never used that patch, but I just looked the sources and I think it
> > should work with James trunk too.
> > Maybe the line numbers are not good, but the added code should work.
> >
> > Try a manual merge and let me know if you have problem with missing
> > methods/components.
> >
> > Stefano
> >
> > PS: It's unlikely that the patch will be included in james 2.3.0. Maybe
> > we'll include a modular way to find out the servernames but not exactly
> > this (this patch add an "ugly" dependency between James main component
> > and a db table with a structure specific to the virtuser mailet)
> 
> 
> I agree with Stefano.  Setup of virtual users and virtual domains should be
> modular and as generic as possible.
> As such it should be as easy working with any db, directory or xml
> definition.
> 
> Pierre
> !EXCUBATOR:2,44076148268921111918378!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to