What would then be the roadmap?

And would then delegated user mgt (e.g. per virtual domain) or self
registration be a possibility?

On 3/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >> I agree with Stefano.  Setup of virtual users and virtual domains
> >> should be modular and as generic as possible.
> >
> >> As such it should be as easy working with any db, directory or xml
> >> definition.
> >
> > Actually, my view is that the API for dynamic changes should be using
> JMX,
> > and that some of these things should be defered until we embed ApacheDS
> > within the core JAMES.  That way, we can count on having both LDAP
> > (ApacheDS) and JDBC (Derby) available for all deployments.
>
> Yeah! I think the changes I made and I'm planning to do will help the
> integration with ApacheDS, too.
>
> Stefano
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to