What would then be the roadmap? And would then delegated user mgt (e.g. per virtual domain) or self registration be a possibility?
On 3/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >> I agree with Stefano. Setup of virtual users and virtual domains > >> should be modular and as generic as possible. > > > >> As such it should be as easy working with any db, directory or xml > >> definition. > > > > Actually, my view is that the API for dynamic changes should be using > JMX, > > and that some of these things should be defered until we embed ApacheDS > > within the core JAMES. That way, we can count on having both LDAP > > (ApacheDS) and JDBC (Derby) available for all deployments. > > Yeah! I think the changes I made and I'm planning to do will help the > integration with ApacheDS, too. > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
