> Btw I think that the avalon framework itself is a good thing to james > and we could adapt james to run under j2ee or spring without getting > rid of avalon interfaces.
We don't use that much of it, but I'd be inclined to migrate to OSGi at such
time as we consider moving.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
