[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-124?page=comments#action_12369306 ] 

Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-124:
---------------------------------------

ETRN would be the easiest way to let an user to kick the queue... BUT, james 
architecture makes the ETRN difficult to implement. The SMTPServer is not aware 
of a RemoteDelivery! In fact SMTPServer is not aware of the SpoolManager and 
the whole Mailet stuff too.

We could change the current architecture by promoting the delivery part of the 
RemoteDelivery to a top level component but we would split the remote delivery 
configuration/behaviour to 2 totally different objects.

Alternatively (and much more easy) a custom CmdHandler for ETRN could be 
written to select all the messages in the ougoing repository and reduce the 
last_updated field of a given amount (big enough to make the ougoing threads to 
try again istantly).


> Add the ability to "kick" the outgoing queue
> --------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JAMES-124
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-124
>      Project: James
>         Type: New Feature
>   Components: MailStore & MailRepository
>     Versions: 2.0a3, 2.1.3, 2.2.0
>  Environment: Operating System: All
> Platform: All
>     Reporter: Jason Webb
>     Priority: Minor

>
> It would be nice to be able to "kick" the outgoing queue to force the queue 
> to 
> deliver all it's pending mail. This is useful after a problem that affects 
> all 
> mail deliveries.
> On a related note the SMTP might also want to support ETRN as well if there 
> anybody uses it anymore.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to