Yes. I will ensure the fix will never block email to postmaster.
  
  Per prior discussion on the default behavior for SMTP authentication, I hope 
to classify the 2 types of email traffic:
  (1) inter-domain: the sender and recipient address contain different domain 
name
  (2) intra-domain: the sender and recipient address contain same domain name.
  
  I so-far hear two arguments that we should not enforce SMTP authentication 
for intra-domain traffic:
  
  (1) RFC requires us to delivery to postmaster. Further, there might a 
business need for a list of "guaranteed delivery" emails.
  
  (2) Intra-domain emails are less important than inter-domain emails.  SMTP 
authentication doesn't completely prevent inter-domain email  address spoofing, 
so we shouldn't use it to prevent "intra-domain"  spoofing.
  
  I think argument (1) is valid, and we should address it.
  
  However, I feel argument (2) is invalid.
  
  Intra-domain problem is quite important for large corporation (say  
corporation > 100 people) and large ISPs (like aol, yahoo, gmail or  hotmail), 
because in these cases intra-domain emails is a significant  portion all email 
traffic (especially in large corporations). 
  
  Intra-domain emails is not easy to protect either because of factors  like 
large number of users, possibility of malicious attacks (worms or  human), and 
inability to constraint user's IP address (in case of  yahoo, gmail, etc.)
  
  People do forget password from time to time, so I can see the  administrator 
might want make exception for a small list of special  destination addresses 
(like postmaster@, abuse@, support@, etc). 
  
  However, if administrator does turn on SMTP authentication, email  client of 
internal users will anyway need to be set up to send in  authentication 
information on every SMTP request. I wonder why the the  administrator wants to 
deliberately disable SMTP authentication for ALL  intra-domain emails (which is 
the current behavior of James). Why  should SMTP only protect emails sent to 
outside of corporation, and not  emails to a corporation?
  
  Ken

"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  > RFC 2821 - Simple Mail Transfer 
Protocol
> 4.5.1 Minimum Implementation
>   Any system that includes an SMTP server supporting mail relaying or
>   delivery MUST support the reserved mailbox "postmaster" as a case-
>   insensitive local name.

See also: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/

People really do maintain block lists of those who do not properly follow
the RFCs.

 --- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 

Reply via email to