Bernd,
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>I'm +1 on java 5 dependencies for tests/support tools if this simplify
>>>the development. Don't know what other committers think about this.
>> *ONLY* for such test/support tools.
> it should not limit the tool's usage to j5. it could be an optional
> run-time and not a compile-time dependency.
Fine. I'm simply saying that I would not vote for a J5 requirement for
JAMES, itself, at this time.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
