Stefano Bagnara wrote, On 4/5/2006 3:19 PM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that what the work will entail is POJO-ifying James. XBean
is just a way of stitching the POJOs in an IOC type of way. I think
that one could add some OSGi adapters on top, if one wanted to. The
nice thing about this way of organization is that one does not have
to use OSGi if one doesn't want to.
What type of IOC is used by XBeans ?
Is it based on the Service Locator pattern like Avalon or Dependency
Injection? In the latter case, what DI type? Constructor, Setter or
Interface injection?
Constructor and Setter DI.
How is the assembly declared? XML / Naming conventions / Annotations /
Other?
XML
I can't find much docs/informations about it.
http://www.xbean.org/Home has some info.
I don't think there is a way to give you access to a branch or a
particular folder of the james subversion repository.
Maybe you should start working in your local sandbox and eventually
add a jira issue where submit your work for review.
No worries. Maybe I should do the work in a Geronimo sandbox then?
I would like to have more informations on XBeans and your plan and
know the opinion of the James PMC about maven2 and xbeans before to
tell my preference on the sandbox location.
Cool. It seems like there are three efforts that we are discussing.
XBean, Maven 2, and cornerstone conversion.
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
