What i have forget is .. your wrote: Not all resolvable/valid domains also have valid mx records configured.
A valid domain which is included in sender must have a valid MX.. Otherwise it would be impossible to send an email back. So i think the MX is the only we should check. bye Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2006, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara (JIRA): > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-465?page=comments#action_12373992 > ] > > Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-465: > --------------------------------------- > > We should document explicitly that the check done is: valid MX record for the > domain and not simply resolvable domain name. > Not all resolvable/valid domains also have valid mx records configured. > They are 2 different checks. > > > Check for valid sender domain in mail from > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > Key: JAMES-465 > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-465 > > Project: James > > Type: New Feature > > > Reporter: Norman Maurer > > Assignee: Stefano Bagnara > > Attachments: MailCmdHandler-Resolv-Fixed.patch, > > MailCmdHandler-Resolv-V2.patch, MailCmdHandler-Resolv.patch, > > SMTPServerTest-Resolv.patch, SMTPTestConfiguration-Resolv.patch, > > james-config.xml-Resolv.patch > > > > I wrote a patch to support checking for resolvable domain in sender before > > accept "mail from:" >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
