Im not a developer to james, but i answer cause i submit it ;-)

I choose to add it to main cause i thought some guys found it a bit
confusing to read about HELO/EHLO in the MailCmdHandler. But i have no
probs to put it to the Handler ( that how i did for the other features i
add).

I also see no negative thinks on move the options to the handlers.

About the postmaster handling: 
I don't see why we should accept emails without HELO/EHLO if
HeloEhloEnforcement is activated. Cause HELO/EHLO must be send (RFC)! 
I don't think that we should accept it for the other cases (sender
domain mx check, resolveable HELO/EHLO) cause if a admin consider to use
this feature he don't want to not use them on postmaster acounts (maybe
im to lazy, but i think thats what admins are ;-)!).
But thats just me thinking.

bye

Norman

Ps: Keep up the nice work guys


Am Samstag, den 15.04.2006, 16:41 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > I will add this improvment to james as fast as i can.. But i think we
> > should add this config value do james core and not the smtphandler chain
> > cause otherwise it whould be in the mail handler (thats a bit
> > confusing).. What you think ?
> 
> I applied the patch as it was (configuration option in the main handler).
> 
> I think it would be better to move the option to the MailCmdHandler, but 
> I would like to know what other developers/users think about this.
> 
> We have more similar commands that could be moved to specific handlers.
> 
> lengthReset (DATA)
> verifyIdentity (RCPT)
> ehloHeloEnforcement (MAIL)
> 
> While the following require iteraction between handlers.
> 
> authorizedAddresses + authRequired (EHLO, MAIL, RCPT)
> MaxMessageSize (EHLO, MAIL, DATA, OnMessage)
> 
> Another thing we should consider is the postmaster recipient handling: 
> RFC says we should always accept mails destinated to postmaster. How 
> should we handle EHLO/HELO enforcements, MAIL FROM domain validation, 
> EHLO/HELO domain validation and that RFC rule?
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> !EXCUBATOR:1,444106a337021224119642!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to