Sounds ok for me. bye
Am Freitag, den 21.04.2006, 10:02 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Norman Maurer wrote: > > Should we maybe throw a exception if someone has set <checkValidHelo> > > true </checkValidHelo> but has <heloEhloEnforcement> false > > </heloEhloEnforcement> set too ? > > Otherwise this check cann simple passed by not sending a helo/ehlo at > > all. > > > > What you guys think ? > > Maybe an info log saying that the checkValidHelo is true but > heloEhloEnforcement is false is enough. > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,4448925637023644411865!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
