Am Sonntag, den 30.04.2006, 09:00 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> 
> > I don't agree: imho we already have a stable release out: 2.2.0.
> 
> Yes, but consider the many enhancements, changes and bugfixes since that
> release that are based upon "feedback and contributions [of] features people
> need."  If we continue to delay releasing those, might not "people [switch]
> to different mail servers", too?
> 
Maybe your right. We should but out a 2.3 release and focus a 2.4
release to add this changes.

> > I would prefer to have a few more alpha cycle and possibly introduce new
> > features before 2.3.0 but I'll not be -1 on putting out a release on the
> > current feature-set.
> 
> Right, that's what I'm saying.  Let's focus on getting a solid release out,
> and then continue with feature changes.
> 
> > If we want to feature freeze here for 2.3.0 then I think we should
> > create a branch so that we can also keep going on with new code.
> 
> We can do that, and it is a good practice, but as you note, "no one here
> work on James as a full time "priority" job", so I am a bit concerned that
> efforts will continue to focus on adding features to another branch rather
> than on putting out a release.  I'm asking that we as a community make
> getting a solid release out a priority.
> 
> And, as Serge notes, by incrementally adding features to a solid release,
> more people will be willing to test it, which helps development.  What does
> it say that neither Serge nor I are running the current code in production?
> I normally ran trunk in production, but there were so many key changes on
> top of one another that I was no longer comfortable putting trunk into
> production.  If we can get into a more frequent release cycle, where we are
> not changing too many things at once, I believe that we'll have better
> pickup.

There are more features which are really intressting we should add in
future. 
1. Maildir support
2. SPF Support ( after Stefano and I are finish with JSpf
3. SMTPHandler chain refactor
4. IMAP ( I think this is the feature which most users really miss now..
Me too)

bye 
Norman

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to