[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-491?page=comments#action_12383335 ] 

Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-491:
---------------------------------------

Changed the store behaviour.

Now JamesSPoolManager calls the store for messages processed by its 
mailProcessor while LInearProcessor calls the store *only* for new mails (mails 
created by a split / partial match).


> SpoolManager refactorings
> -------------------------
>
>          Key: JAMES-491
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-491
>      Project: James
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: SpoolManager & Processors
>     Versions: 2.3.0a2
>     Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>     Assignee: Stefano Bagnara

>
> JamesSPoolManager and LinearProcessor should be refactored in 3 layers:
> 1) the spoolmanager: create threads and worker, accept mails and pass them to 
> the "mail processor"
> 2) JamesProcessor: manage a list of processors and pass the mail to the 
> processor given its current state
> 3) LInearProcessor: remain almost unchanged, but handle its own configuration.
> The 3 objects could be transformed in toplevel components in order to remove 
> the ContainerUtil usage and have a better codebase to run in different 
> containers.
> The final goal would be to have a modular spoolmanager: we could then 
> introduce an OutgoingSpoolManager that simply implement the current 
> "scheduling" and people could wire together spoolmanagers and mail processors 
> as they prefer.
> It also makes more sense to have the RemoteDelivery in a top level component 
> instead of using Mailet instantiated threads.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to