Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> About comminication media I agree that having a single channel
> is better for all. As I said I think that commit notifications
> and JIRA notifications in the mailing list count for that.
Notification and discussion are not the same thing.
> I want to make clear that ALL of the commits I made on James in the
> last year are not the consequence
No one is accusing you, or anyone else, or doing otherwise. Keep in mind
that this thread started because I saw a lot of discussion via JIRA, and
wanted to make sure that it got moved to mailing lists, where it belongs.
This is not about private discussions; just public ones via the wrong
medium.
> sometime I simply think about an issue and I try solving it while
> thinking [and] I explain what I did (most time in JIRA, because I
> always open JIRA issues for tasks I do).
That's not a discussion, so that's not an issue. HOWEVER ... I don't mind
at all that the explanation goes into JIRA, but it really should be part of
the SVN commit message, too. Having the commit records in one system and
the (only) commentary in another will be a huge problem in the long run. It
is important to keep them together. I don't say that you are alone in doing
this; I'm sure that I've done the wrong thing, too. I'm pointing out that
this is a problem, and we should all be more aware of it.
> In a collaboration effort people trust each other in respective
activities.
We're saying that when there is a discussion, e-mail is the medium. Again,
it is OK if we have some off-list discussion, but we need to bring it to
e-mail and include the community.
> Communication is mostly needed when 2 or more developers works on the
> same thing in synchronous
I disagree. It is even MORE important when multiple developers are working
asynchronously.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
