Hi Noel,
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Yes, subsequently we looked closer at JavaMail, and it wasn't clear how much it
would help. JavaMail has been focused on the needs of clients, not servers.
For the "normal" server operations it is maybe more powerful and
complicated than needed. This conflicts to "keep it simple".
So a slim interface like MailStore is better.
But I would suggest using Javamail for an imap implementation because
javamail reflects perfectly all needed operations. (Apart from that
missing UIDPlusFolder interface)
A possibility for using Javamail stores in James would be great to offer
opportunity for making one implementation of a store method and use it
in the server and client through a standardized way.
Joachim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
