Søren Hilmer wrote:
I am a +1 for Maven.
I believe that Maven greatly simplifies build, test, documentation.
Of course you have to buy it's POM, but I do not consider that to be a major
drawback, since it is close to what we got and is well designed.
It is my opinion that if you try to bend your own POM to Maven instead of
adopting Maven's POM you are in for a bumpy ride, and in that case I would be
-1 on the subject.
--Søren
Hi Søren,
Just to be sure I understood your comment when you say "POM" you mean
the SDL ?
If I understood your message you are +1 to change our current layout to
match the default maven2 layout and have a simple pom.xml because we
"refactor" our repository to match the maven2 standard.
You are instead -1 to introduce maven2 as a complicate pom.xml that
override every default to match our current build model.
Is this correct or is this the opposite of your thought?
Stefano
PS: I think that SDL (Standard Directory Layout) is one of the best
thing introduced by the maven project. When I look to new projects using
the SDL I feel home, I understand much more thing at a glance than what
I understand from non SDL projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
