Forget it.. now i understand.. But im not sure if someone really need this.
bye Norman Am Montag, den 29.05.2006, 10:24 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer: > Is that rfc conform ? Im not sure.. > > bye > Norman > > Am Montag, den 29.05.2006, 08:17 +0000 schrieb Stefano Bagnara (JIRA): > > [ > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-266?page=comments#action_12413687 > > ] > > > > Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-266: > > --------------------------------------- > > > > It's not the same of AddHeader. AddHeader will add a message header in the > > form of "HeaderName: value" in the header of the MimeMessage. This request > > is instead similar to what AddFooter does: adding a text in the message > > body. > > Maybe it should be better to add a flag in the AddFooter mailet to put the > > footer at the top. Either way it will not be too much clear. > > AddHeading vs AddHeader would create confusion, btw also using AddFooter to > > add an header will create confusion... > > > > > Would like AddHeader as counterpart to AddFooter to insert text at top > > > of message > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: JAMES-266 > > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-266 > > > Project: James > > > Type: New Feature > > > > > Components: Matchers/Mailets (bundled) > > > Reporter: Kulvir Bhogal > > > > > > > > User would like a counterpart to AddFooter such that: > > > <mailet match="All" class="AddHeading"> > > > <text> > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > Heading > > > </text> > > > </mailet> > > > results in a heading prefixed on messages. > >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
