Noel J. Bergman wrote:
There is the issue of timing. When would it be mutually convenient
for people to adjust their systems to account for such a change? We
have not only you, me, Bernd, Norman. We have other people on the
list who build the code. And untold more who are not constantly
active on the list.
Well, they can build the revision before the change. As they are not
actively and does not collaborate I don't see any problem with them
sticking with they preferred revision until they feel better moving forward.
Your "potentially 1000s of other developers" make me smile: I would like
to have at least a few patches submitted back from that "potential"
community in the last year.
The trunk is not there for the release or for the mainstream users, the
trunk is there to work and should be used by people that work, to work.
I'm starting feeling really bad about this issue.
Again, a simple e-mail along the lines of "Next Friday, a week from
now, we will be ___. In order to prepare for ___, you will need to
do ___.", and adding instructions to SVN, as I did, would have
helped.
Well, thank you, I call this collaboration.
I already did similar things fixing bugs not introduced by me or
improving things committed by others with no need to loose much time
criticizing.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
