Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> What I am suggesting is restoring the file to its original state.
> Then, instead of removing the hashes, only line 156 should be
> changed. Then let's see what happens.
> From a code review I don't think this will fix the leak
I agree with Stefano. The purpose of the cache is to track all streams so
that it can force them closed when remove is called. The "problem" is that
remove is not being called, at least not fast enough.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
