Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Norman Maurer wrote: > > > i whould like to use setter methods for that in all mailets > and matchers > > Ah, I just asked you about this. OK, that explains the change we were > discussing. :-) > > > Anyone has a problem with that? > > On the one hand, Java isn't Smalltalk, and I have little need > to treat it as > such when initializing simple private properties, but it > might help eclipse > users, since the tool can inspect, and we can centralize logging, > validation, etc., so sure, why not? For protected and public > properties, > I'm sure that we're all +1 to proper bean properties.
+1 For getters and setters for protected and public properties My personal preference is for private properties too, but its just a personal preference. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
