Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> 1) What are the benefits of inverting the queue <=> processor relation?
See my replies to Steve. I'm after several capabilities, and did consider
several alternative syntactic approaches, but only care about relative ease
of expression and functional capability.
> 2) Are you willing to actually implement this or is this just a
discussion?
I'd expect to work on it. I'd also expect that more than one person would
work on different aspects of it.
> I'm +1 to experiment and refactor the code to add some of the features
> you describe here (e.g: fallthrough, transactions) as a progressive
> evolution.
We already have fallthrough, but adding that as an attribute would be a
simple and nice enhancement. Transactions are rather more work.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
