Here are the results:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
A summary of this week:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
I hope we don't need a single vote for every single issue, so please
help with short and clear "vote like" answers to the points (I prefer
a clear -1 than a long discussion: at least with a -1 we don't delay
the next release).
--- Add a default hardcoded configuration for the SMTPHandlerChain
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-496
(I would also like to remove the default handlerchain configuration
from the default config.xml and maybe add it to a commented complete
config.xml)
3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
1 -0 Bernd
if no other votes in few days I'll backport it.
Applied to 2.3.
Moved handlerchain configuration to james-smtphandlerchain.xml and
commented out by default.
--- Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by
default (db/dbfile/file)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536
I think we should put dbfile by default in the advanced config, but
use db or file by default in the default config.xml. I have no real
preference between the 2. I use db, but I think that most "first time"
users would better understand the file repositories.
db:
2 +1 Stefano, Norman
file:
3 +1 Stefano, Vincenzo, Bernd
dbfile:
if no one else raise his voice on this issue we should change the
default to "file" for users and mail repository.
Moved to file by Norman.
--- Remove RepositoryManager and cornerstone-store-impl
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-515
+1 to remove it (backport the trunk change)
(Bernd already replied against this, but it is not clear to me wether
it was a -0 or a -1, so please cast a veto if you think it is needed,
otherwise we can count the votes: please don't answer that we should
decide the real plan because I don't believe we can actively discuss
about what is alpha/beta/rc and what should teoretically be included
in the branch. I really prefear e real vote on a real issue. We don't
have a generic rule but at least we know if we agreed to include it or
not).
+1 Stefano, Norman
-0 Bernd
-1 Vincenzo *VETO*
This doesn't need more votes, I just removed this issue from our 2.3
roadmap.
Vetoed. Files have been kept.
--- Functionality of DNSServer.getByName(String) is not symetric to
java.net.InetAddress.getByName(String)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-302
I would like to move this out from the 2.3 roadmap (2.4). We'll
discuss wether to include this or not in 2.4/3.0 later.
4 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo, Bernd (WOW, the same for all ;-) )
Updated JIRA (removed from the 2.3 roadmap)
Done.
--- Once we'll have decided what to include and included it we are
ready for the next release. Do we want to call it 2.3.0b2 or 2.3.0rc1 ?
here is my vote:
+1 for 2.3.0b2
+0 for 2.3.0rc1
2.3.0b2
3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
1 +1 Bernd (if we include JAMES-496)
2.3.0rc1
+1 Stefano
+1 Bernd (if we don't include JAMES-496)
-1 Norman
I think we have to stick to 2.3.0b2 because 2.3.0rc1 has a -1.
I think/hope we'll vote for 2.3.0b2 soon.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
