Thanks for the quick response!
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Your fix makes sense to me.
I agree that line was probably there by mistake.
I think we should backport this to 2.3 branch (I verified the same wrong
line is there too) for the next release.
Just needed it removed for extracting above block as a method on its own.
It does no harm, it's not a bug, so no need to backport from my point of
view.
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
