Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > -1
> > Please remove all of that from the handlers, and make it
> > available to the handlers via the protocol session object.
Or suitable alternative, e.g., HandlerContext.
> > Handlers should know nothing about Avalon. Let's please get
> > that code out of there, and stop putting more in.
> Are you vetoing the whole JAMES-494 or simply limiting JAMES-494 to
> currently top level components we have in assembly.xml ?
Just the handlers. We will deal with additional pojofication in due course,
but the ones in assembly.xml *are* the bridge between us and Avalon. I just
don't want to push that API any deeper.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
