Am Mittwoch, den 12.07.2006, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >> As a person having SVN karma, would you mind to turn on SVN > >> notifications for postage > > > > Yes. And, honestly, I'm annoyed. The mailer must be configured BEFORE the > > commits are made, not after. As far as I know, we now need a list of every > > revision number for all of the commits to postage so that we can re-run the > > mailer to generate the notices. But I realize that this wasn't intentional. > > No one meant to do anything wrong, they just don't know what they are doing > > in terms of how SVN is configured. > > > > For future reference, DO NOT CREATE ANYTHING DIRECTLY UNDER james/ unless > > you know how, and have authorization, to change the mailer configuration. > > Who, between James committers, have authorization to change this? > - We voted for POSTAGE to be created on 2006/05/26 > - the vote contained the JIRA and SVN references > - There is even a JIRA issue to remember to prepare the commit > notifications and the JIRA project. > > I waited almost a month and one week ago there was no JIRA issue: I > asked Serge to do that and we finally have it. > > For the next time I will ask even for the notification mail but I'd like > to know what is the procedure for that and who to ask when you don't > find the time to do that. > > > As an aside, since we're talking about SVN and I'm in a snarky mood, we > > should get rid of this sandbox nonsense. Let's stick with the standard > > tags, branches, trunk. What's a sandbox? A branch for playing in. Fine. > > Put it under branches. > > > > --- Noel > > If you remember we voted for that so I don't think we should remove the > sandbox. > If you have a different Idea you should have replied to the vote. If you > missed it start an opposite vote ;-) > > When I voted I thought at this differences between the branches and > sandbox folder: > - branches is for "official", long running, persistent product versions > - sandbox is less formal and a place where branches are created and > removed without the fear to create confusion in the branches folder. > > I could reply to you: "what's a tag? A branch that is no changed" but > even if at repository level there is no difference in the real life > there is a clear and logical separation between the 2. > > Btw, I think we can bring our ideas and our preferences but we should > simply use the easy tool (the vote). > > I'm still convinced that it is good to have a sandbox in the main james > folder and the sandbox of the james/server folder because I saw that > James PMCs with karma have not so much time to follow the project > reactively and I think that having sandboxes can make us moving a little > faster. > > Stefano >
I also like the sandbox. For example for the fastfail stuff the sandbox is cool. Cause after commit to trunk i whould simply remove it.. Why we not simply write such thinks down to the wiki so anyone know if its ok or not.. sometimes i feelin really "unclear" about many things in james ;.( bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
