Should i repack the 2.3.0b3 release with the JAMES-566 fixed ? Or should we release it without the patch ?
bye Norman Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 08:09 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer: > Only do give you some more feedback. We run it since yesterday in > production ( as mailrelay ) without problems . > > Bye > Norman > > Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 22:46 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer: > > I just thought you want to slow it down :-D (Just kiddin).. Nice to > > know that you run it in postage before cast your vote .. > > > > Thx > > Norman > > > > Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 22:27 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann: > > > +1 to release it. > > > > > > Bernd > > > > > > (for the vote, I am running the candidate for 8 hrs under scenario > > > 'release'. if everything turns out OK, I cast the vote. that's way I am > > > always late ;-)) > > > > > > Norman Maurer wrote: > > > > After the fix of the 2 blockin issues i think we are ready for a new > > > > beta release. So i build,sign and upload it. > > > > > > > > You can grab it from: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/ > > > > > > > > bye > > > > Norman > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
