Imho we should find an agreement on what we can do in 2.3 and what we can't.
I don't have a real need for 2.3 to be out sooner or later or with or without a specific feature, so I will be happy to use a -0/+0 with not vetoes or hard positions about this, but what I really want to know is what is the rule.
AFAIK Bernd casted a -1 on the backport of JAMES-515 (remove of an unused class and an unused JAR) because, If I understood it correctly, he thinks we should only put FIXES in 2.3 branch at this point.
Furthermore I hear Noel saying that we will release 3.0 before the end of the year, and I think that if we start including new features in 2.3 it will be good if we release James 2.3.0 final by the end of the year.
Now I see ideas to change the launcher and to add the SPFHandler... I think we should first decide a general rule for the current 2.3 status, then I will be able to cast my vote.
Stefano Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys, i write this email cause Vincenso and Noel both aksed me if its possible to "backport" the SPFHandler to 2.3. The problem is that in 2.3 we have no real fastfail. But if you guys want i can backport it anyway. im +0 todo this. What the other commiters think?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
