I'm going to put it in production this weekend. If no serious bug comes
out I'll keep it there and as such consider it a real RC :-) .
Crossing my fingers ;-)
Vincenzo
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
+1 for 2.3.0b4
+1 for 2.3.0rc1
We didn't define a release naming policy, so we can do as we like: it
is more a marketing issue than anything else.
I think that rc1 may give us more users, but this will be a good thing
only if James is really near to a final release. Otherwise we'll get
more users now but we'll loose users in the long term.
Stefano
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
i think we are ready again for a new release. Im using it at the moment
without a problem in production.So i whould call it rc1. if noone has a
problem with that i can build,sign and upload the release to my page.
bye
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
