I think we should add only a docs folder which holds the javadocs (only in src). Thats all.
bye Norman Am Samstag, den 29.07.2006, 19:46 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Please, as we are in rc and we may want to make a new release soon, > comment this issue. > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582 > > Stefano > > Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582?page=comments#action_12423875 > > ] > > > > Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-582: > > --------------------------------------- > > > > Furthermore Norman noted that in our rc1 src distro there are javadocs in > > the www folder. > > > > I think this is a lack in our build system: I see that some of our src > > releases include the www folder with some parts of the website, other > > releases don't include this one. > > > > Should we try to fix this for 2.3.0? What would we like to include and in > > what packages? > > > > > >> Released packages confusions (name, artifacts) > >> ---------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Key: JAMES-582 > >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582 > >> Project: James > >> Issue Type: Wish > >> Components: Build System > >> Affects Versions: 2.3.0rc1 > >> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara > >> Priority: Minor > >> Fix For: 2.3.0 > >> > >> > >> We currently name "james-*" our releases. > >> 1) We should rename them to add at least "server" => james-server-* > >> 2) Currenlty james-XXX-src.* and james-with-phoenix-XXX-src.* are the same > >> thing: why do we need 2? what would be the intended difference? I would > >> like to remove the james-with-phoenix-XXX-src from our release. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,44cb9f2343385531625449!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
