Am Mittwoch, den 09.08.2006, 00:15 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> Stefano,
> 
> > The problem is that downloading this artifacts directly from
> > java.sun.com gives you signed jars including the OLD license file.
> 
> Yes, Sun still has issues coming to grips with its own changes.
I still can't believe :-(


> 
> > To obtain binary/source JARs including the new CDDL license we have to
> > use the maven-repository where the glassfish project deploy the artifacts
> 
> > This jars are not signed by sun.
> 
> I know, and I am *NOT* happy about it.  Sun's own signing keys are (quite
> properly) kept secure, and not used for java.net.  But I'm hoping to
> convince Bill Shannon to join our WoT, and sign the files that he posts.
> For example, I signed David Van Couvering's key, and he could sign Bill's.
> 
> In the meantime, I have spoken with Bill, and he tells me that those are the
> jars that he posted there, and only Glassfish developers (~180) (are
> supposed to) have write access to that repository area on java.net.
> 
> So if you'll download and commit those to SVN, I'll ask Bill to please
> verify that what we have in SVN is what he posted.

I just did this so plz ask him to review so we can move forward to rc2.

> 
> > This would really simplify the job of building james from subversion
> > using only ant.
> 
> Always a good thing.  :-)
> 
>       --- Noel

bye
Norman

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to