I don't think that its a good idea to do the mapping in fastfail. I think the best way at the moment whould be to check for valid mappings only.
bye Norman Am Montag, den 28.08.2006, 05:53 -0700 schrieb Noel J. Bergman (JIRA): > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-597?page=comments#action_12430969 > ] > > Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-597: > --------------------------------------- > > Some caveats: > > 1) We want to support multiple virtual user table implementations, as we do > with the mailets. Two options would be: (a) a single Command Handler told > which implementation to use, to which it would have to pass the > configuration; (b) separate implementations, with a shared base, just as we > have for mailets. The latter seems cleaner. > 2) There are legitimate use cases for having more than one of these in the > handler chain. > 3) When we generate the Received: header for the message, it should have > the ORIGINAL receipients as specified by the RCPT command, not the mapped > results. > 4) Please do note that the target string from the mapper can have error:, > regex:, etc., not just a simple address. > > > Add rcpthandler to map virtual users before call ValidRcptHandler > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: JAMES-597 > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-597 > > Project: James > > Issue Type: Sub-task > > Components: SMTPServer > > Reporter: Norman Maurer > > Assigned To: Norman Maurer > > > > We should create an rcpt handler which do the mapping of virtual users > > before call the ValidRcptHandler. This will bring us also the advance that > > we not need to map the users later again with a mailet. >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
