Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > OK, I believe that I have a "simple" solution, which I will try and
> > hopefully commit tomorrow.
> >
> > I'm going to push the filter further into the code where we can
> > effect the cache directly.
> This sound similar to my first approach:
> I changed getNextPendingMessage to getNextAvailableMessage(Filter) and
> moved the accept inside the method so that I have the accept in the same
> code where we manage the pendingMessages cache.
I'm pushing the filter all the way down to where we actually populate the
cache, so that loadPendingMessages(Filter) will populate the cache with up
to the first <maxcache> *accepted* messages from the ResultSet, rather than
consume the cache with currently unacceptable messages.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
