On 9/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> my point was, maybe this is not a newly introduced bug... but
> validating this seems to be impossible since the mail server
> world changed so heavily, as you suggest.
It is quite possible that it is an old bug that is surfacing now because
other bugs got out of the way. There were old bugs that caused me to have
to cycle JAMES 2.2 on a daily basis to keep it from throwing OOM.
are you saying, you upgraded directly from "2.2/daily restart" to
"2.3xx/memory leak". or has there been a "2.3yy/memory fine" in
between?
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
